Tuesday 11 September 2018

New Belgian Act on protection of trade secrets entered into force

Trade secrets, and the know-how that is covered by them, are an essential asset for all businesses.

On 24 August 2018 the new Belgian Act on
the protection of trade secrets entered into force. The act was signed in the
middle of this summer’s heatwave on 30 July 2018 and implements European
Directive 2016/943 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information
against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure. In this newsletter, we
discuss the essence of this new Act concerning the protection of trade secrets.

The new Act defines a ‘trade secret’ as information
which fulfils all of the following requirements:

  1. it is secret in the sense that it is not, as a body or in the precise
    configuration and assembly of its components, generally known among or readily
    accessible to persons within the circles that normally deal with the kind of
    information in question;
  2. it has commercial value because it is secret;
  3. it has been subject to reasonable steps under the circumstances, by the
    person lawfully in control of the information, to keep it secret.

Under the new Act, the judge may, at the request of
the trade secret holder, order any of the following measures against the
alleged infringer of a trade secret:

  1. the cessation or the prohibition of the acquisition, use or disclosure
    of the trade secret;
  2. the prohibition of the production, offering, placing on the market or
    use of infringing goods, or the importation, export or storage of infringing
    goods for those purposes;
  3. the recall of the infringing goods from the market;
  4. depriving the infringing goods of their infringing quality;
  5. destruction of the infringing goods or, where appropriate, their
    withdrawal from the market, provided that the withdrawal does not undermine the
    protection of the trade secret in question;
  6. destruction of all or part of any document, object, material, substance
    or electronic file containing or embodying the trade secret, or, where
    appropriate, the delivery up to the applicant of all or part of those
    documents, objects, materials, substances or electronic files.

Those measures shall be without prejudice to any
damages that may be due to the trade secret holder by reason of the unlawful
acquisition, use or disclosure of the trade secret.

At the request of the person liable to be subject to
the measures, the new Act provides that the competent judicial authority may
order pecuniary compensation to be paid to the injured party instead of
applying those measures if all the following conditions are met:

  1. the person concerned at the time of use or disclosure neither knew nor
    ought, under the circumstances, to have known that the trade secret was
    obtained from another person who was using or disclosing the trade secret
    unlawfully;
  2. execution of the measures in question would cause that person
    disproportionate harm; and
  3. pecuniary compensation to the injured party appears reasonably
    satisfactory.

There are several exceptions. The provisions
concerning trade secrets should not affect the exercise of fundamental rights,
in particular the right of freedom of opinion and information. Nor should it
affect the application of rules that require the disclosure of information,
including trade secrets, to the public or public authorities. The provisions
concerning trade secrets should also not be understood as restricting the mobility
of workers.

Trade secrets, and the know-how that is covered by
them, are an essential asset for all businesses. The new Act provides for a
better protection of this important asset and is therefore highly welcome.